Implications of Universal Expansion

Hubble's dataset was sufficient to demonstrate the first important observation in our modern cosmology, namely, the redshift of a galaxy is directly proportional to its distance from the observer. This is shown schematically in Figure 2.4 and can be summarized by the equation below:

Vr = HoD

where Vr is the radial velocity away from the observer, Ho is a constant (called Hubble's constant), and D is the distance to the galaxy. This linear relation between Vr and D means the Universe is in a state of uniform expansion. The slope of this linear relation is the expansion rate or Ho.

Figure 2.4 Schematic representation of velocity-distance relation. Each of the 5 galaxies is separated from another by a distance D and thus each galaxy has a velocity with respect to one another of V . No matter which galaxy your are located on, you recover the slope of the dashed line. The case illustrated here is from the perspective of an observer on Galaxy 1.

If we refer to Figure 2.4, we can see how this relation works. If you are located on the middle galaxy, you will observe the other two galaxies moving away from you with Vr = +/- V and +/- 2V . If you were located on Galaxy 1, you would observe Vr = V, 2V,3V and 4V which correspond to distances of D, 2D, 3D, and 4D . In this way, any observer would see the direct relation between Vr and D .

There is always a good deal of confusion that students have when it comes to understanding what expansion actually means. As we will discuss later, our modern cosmological model is known as the Big Bang model and that always conveys the wrong impression to students concerning the driver of the expanding Universe. We can best demonstrate what is occurring by considering the following thought experiment (which could be a real one if you found some cooperative ants).

The Ant Universe

To start with, get a small bomb and place some ants on its surface (hint: use indestructible ants). Set the bomb off and notice what happens to the ants. The ants will fly radially away from the center of the bomb but they will be distributed on an ever expanding spherical shell. At no time will the ants become spread out in radial distance from the point of the initial explosion. Instead, they will will remain confined to the shell as it diffuses outwards. This is not what we observe for galaxies, as alluded to before. Galaxies, therefore, are not "flying" through the Universe as a consequence of some physical explosion.

Next, get a balloon and inflate it about half way. Sprinkle some ants onto the surface of the balloon and continue to inflate it. Notice that while you are inflating the balloon the ants are walking randomly around its surface. Some will be walking towards each other and some away. There will be no well-defined correlation between the distance between any two ants and their relative motion. This again is not what we observe and indicates there is some controlling agent that is causing the relative motion between galaxies to depend on distance.

Finally, get some glue (super glue works best) and glue the ants to the balloon (this is actually quite hard to do unless you have a really good pair of tweezers). As you inflate the balloon you will notice that the ants are no longer moving. The ants are stationary but the separation between each ant is increasing as the surface of the balloon increases as a result of it being inflated. If you pick any one ant on the balloon, all the other ants appear to be moving away from that ant. It matters not which ant you pick. Hence, every ant believes they are in the center of the ant distribution when in fact you know that there is no center because the ants are distributed on a surface. So what happens when you let the air out of the balloon? The ants all approach each other until they are all together (more or less) in one big ant glue-ball.

While this analog may seem silly, in fact, it's quite appropriate to the real Universe. Gravity is the "glue" that fixes the galaxies to the surface of the Universe. In the case of the Universe, this surface is a four dimensional spacetime surface which is embedded in some five dimensional volume. As this is rather difficult to draw on a two dimensional piece of paper, we use the analogy of the two dimensional balloon surface embedded in a three-dimensional volume. The key is to adopt the ant perspective. The ant is a two dimensional creature that really doesn't know it's on a surface. As we just saw above, the surface of the balloon has no center and the collapse of the balloon means the surface area has decreased (in principle, to zero).

In the case of our Universe, as the surface expands, the separation between all the galaxies increases and the observational manifestation of this is galaxy redshifts. This uniform expansion of the Universe makes a clear and important prediction. If galaxies are getting farther apart from each other due to the expansion of the surface, then in the past the galaxies were much closer to one another. Indeed, there must have even been a time when all the galaxies (all the matter) in the Universe were together in the same space at the same time. This means that the early Universe was a very small dense place and in a physical state well-removed from how it is observed to be today.

Models of a Dense Universe

By 1929 Hubble presented the bulk of the observational evidence for the expanding Universe. The wide acceptance of this evidence is what lead Einstein to declare his Cosmological Constant to be a bad idea. The next step was the application of some simple thermodynamic models to the expanding Universe. To first order, the expanding Universe acts just like an expanding gas. As the gas expands to fill more volume it must cool. This is the thermodynamic concept of entropy, where the expanding gas becomes more disordered which requires a larger volume for it to fill. In 1934, the physicist Tolman made a thermodynamic model of the Universe to predict that if the Universe has radiation in it, that pattern of radiation will have a thermal spectrum which will cool with time. This thermal spectrum will have the same characteristics as what we call blackbody radiation from stars. This means that if this radiation has always been present in the Universe and it has been cooling ever since, then the initial state of the Universe must have been very hot. This lead to a series of investigations about the implications of a hot, dense Universe.

If the early Universe is governed by a state of rapid expansion and cooling then its very dynamic in nature. The physicist George Gamow explored this nature in a series of theoretical investigations in the 1940s. In so doing, Gamow postulated a very important condition that must have existed in the early Universe. At sufficiently high temperatures where the average energy of a photon would exceed the rest mass energy of a neutron, then it would not be possible for any atomic nuclei to exist. If one formed, it would be immediately photo-dissociated by one of these high energy photons. Hence, in this state, the Universe had to consist of a sea of elementary particles at very high temperature. As a result of this state, the current abundance of helium (the simplest element that contains neutrons) must be related to how much radiation was present. If too much radiation was present, helium might never have formed. Gamow used the estimated helium abundance of the Universe at that time to make a prediction about the level of radiation that now exists in the Universe. He predicted that the Universe should be filled with photons of characteristic wavelength a few millimeters. At the time this prediction was made, no technology existed to try and detect this background. This again illustrates the principle that advances in cosmological models often require having the right kind of detector available to test predictions.

Horizons and the Expansion Age of the Universe:

V = HD c = HD ==> D =c/H ==> This is our causal horizon - beyond this distance something would have to travel faster than the speed of light in order to communicate with us. All observers are surrounded by such a horizon.

Horizons are okay. Our assumption about homogeneity means that the stuff beyond the horizon is the same stuff we already know about. This assumption must be correct due to horizon overlaps and causality.

Back to the Ants glued to the balloon:

So what do we know now:

At some earlier time, all the galaxies had to have been together in the same space at the same time the Universe was once really small. It is important to realize that the galaxies are stuck to the surface of the universe by gravity and its the surface that expands. The galaxies themselves are not moving but travel along with the surface as shown here .

Run time backwards and realize that all the galaxies used to be together.

Key Points:

  • Gravity: Curvature of SpaceTime: Mass causes this curvature; space is deformed around this mass; this deformation is gravity. The more mass there is, the more deformation (curvature) there is and gravitational field becomes stronger

  • Galaxy Redshifts indicate that galaxies are moving radially away from one another

  • V=HD demands that the expansion is uniform

  • Since the universe is a SURFACE (in spacetime) then it has no CENTER!

  • In the past the Universe was a smaller place but still had the same mass in it - in the way distant past, all of this mass was in the same place at the same time, except that it wasn't mass it was Energy