Projected Expense savings are large:
Most common form of CSP is the solar "trough" systems:
The heat exchanger:
Large arrays can be built to leverage abandoned cooling towers:
354 MW capacity located on 7 square km of desert in California So thats about 50 MW per square km.
Some equivalencies:
Many commercial systems now use something called a parabolic trough: , Here the focus point of the parabolic trough is a receiver pipe. The pipe is filled with oil (not crude oil) and is heated to about 400 C. This heat energy is then used to generate electricity in a conventional steam generator.
Additional considerations:
Several challenges exist to using concentrators. For example, the required
concentrating optics are significantly more expensive than the simple covers
needed for flat-plate solar systems.
Most concentrators must track the sun throughout the day and year to be effective.
This requires expensive tracking mechanisms and precise control systems. A
flat plate system is stationary.
Various Designs for concentrator systems:
Solar Thermal Towers uses these
arrays.
The centralized power tower is still being invested in:
But this technology is limited by optics and is not scalable!
Can be made Large
Point Focus Array:
Most
Expensive but can track the sun.
Within CPV systems, the concentration rato can have high variance.
If light that falls on 100 sq. cm of reflector surface is focussed onto a 1 sq. cm surface of PV material, then the concentration ratio is 100. Current commercial design concentration ratios are in the range 200-300 suns. Anything beyond 500 suns is likely impractical due to potential heat fatigue of the material
But let's be optimistic and return to the theme of multi-use of land per horizontal footprint and envision
The New Shopping Mall - using Solar Concentrated Power to make Hydrogen :
Major point: most parking lots are useless but could easily be transformed into land that produces energy.