Assignment 4 The Last One, Worth More Points than previous onesDue: Thursday August 13 by 11 PM Now your tasked with using data to test those claimes. Data Source: Make maps here The above link should default to the April - June 2020 rank maps of all 50 states. This shows that over that period of time the average temperature of Oregon was 105 (that is its rank) There are 2020-1895 = 125 years available to define the rank and therefore these year, the average temperature ranked was 105/125. If this year was the hottest ever then the rank would be 124 (and color of the state would be Red). As you see from the map the highest ranked state was Florida at 120. The color coding for the Oregon indicateds qualitatively that the temperatue was "above average"). Now you have what you need to interpret the maps you make and make them for all four seasons. For summer you want to select August in the Month; Fall would be November; Winter would be February; spring would be May. Start in the year 2010 and start winter. So your settings should be year = 2010; month = February. Hit the submit button. if Oregon shows rank 92 then all is well. To counter your social media group, make a table of each year from 2010 to 2020 and for each season tabluate if its above,much above or near record or below, much below, or near record. Submit that table as part of the assignment. Now based on those results, write a 200 word summary to share with your social media group if its indeed true that global warming in Oregon means consistently hotter summers. There are 8 major hydro electric dams on the Columbia + Snake River that are thought to impeded the bulk of the salmon flow. These dams are 1) Bonneville, 2) The Dalles, 3) John Day, 4) McNary, 5) Ice Harbor, 6) Lower Monumental, 7) Little Goose and 8) Lower Granite.
Note that nameplate capacity represents the maximum theoretical power output of a plant. Actual generation of power depends on the seasonal flow of the rivers. Net generation is always less than nameplate capacity for renewables. For fossil fuel plants they generally operate near nameplate capacity. b) In 2018 Oregon required 16,600 MWs of electrical power. In 2018 Washington required 31,000 MWs of electrical power. Calculate and report the contribution of the first 4 dams to the total percentage of Electricity Generation for Washington and Oregon assuming operation at full nameplate capacity (this will be changed in question 3 below) c) Dams 5-8 only benefit Washington State. What is the extra percentage contribution of the existence of these 4 dams to the total electricity profile of Washington State?
b) From that rate predict the installed wind capacity in both WA and OR in the year 2030 (show your process) c) Research the amount that stream flow has been reduced in the columbia river basic since 2000 as a result of our changing PNW climate and determine what fraction of nameplate capacity is now being utilized. Given this reduce stream flow, how much does this change the percentages for Oregon and Washington calculated in question 2. d) Based on that calculation, write a 150 word "Blog" style argument on the feasibility of removing some of these dams because of the eventual repacement wind power by the year 2030. You are to access a variety of reports as this is a controversial subject and in a 300 word report, argue whether or not Telsa will have enough lithium for its battery packs to reach their eventual production goal. To properly do this essay, you need to pay attention and to hear what these two people are saying. They are not spewing drivel and idle chit-chat crap and they are worth listening too in a uni-tasking manner. |