1. In general, students should make use of accumulating evidence to synthesize points that are consistent with the prompts. For instance, what the accumulating evidence is for logic, order, simplification, experimentation, accuracy and doubt have been discussed. Those are the precursors!

2. In some cases there was too literal of mapping of the Prime Mover on to Descartes God for injecting motion. The two are different. Read This (http://www.jstor.org/stable/639643)

3. Descartes Principles and Newton's Laws are not very similiar - Descartes really knows nothing about the physics of motion, he just assumes that a small number of principles exist.

4. There are many examples of student proclamations saying "Descartes belives this ..." without providing any of his quotes as evidence for you to make this statement. For example:

These are all reasonable statments but would be much better if some evidence was used as well.

5. The Universe can be ordered without the need for a divine being!

6. Most of you did not incoporate Kant into Prompt C but that would have helped and the material was there. In fact, to quote from plato. stanford.edu

7. Remember, perfection in terms of perfect circles exists in the ancient world, Aristotle, and continues through Copernicus. It is Kepler who empirically shows this is not the case. The use of math gives the perception of perfect and precise and the Clockwork Universe is best manifest as Kepler's Third Law (left out by most of you)